Hica vs Koka

hica transpiles to Koka, so everything hica does ultimately is Koka. The question isn’t “which is more powerful?” (Koka will always win that). The question is: why add a layer on top?

The short answer: the differences are about intent, ergonomics, and tooling. Koka is a world-class research language exploring the cutting edge of algebraic effects. hica is an industrial-pragmatic language designed for building everyday software (CLI tools, parsers, utilities) with a familiar syntax, a curated feature set, and an integrated toolchain.

At a Glance

Syntax: Familiar vs Novel

Koka’s syntax is ML-inspired. It is clean but unfamiliar to most programmers:

fun factorial(n : int) : int
  if n <= 1 then 1
  else n * factorial(n - 1)

fun main()
  println(factorial(5))

hica uses braces, => arrows, and let, patterns that developers recognise from Rust, TypeScript, and C#:

fun factorial(n) => if n <= 1 { 1 } else { n * factorial(n - 1) }

fun main() {
  println(factorial(5))
}

Neither is objectively better. But if you are teaching a class, onboarding junior developers, or writing your first compiled language, the brace style has less to explain.

Effects: Curated Complexity

This is the biggest philosophical difference. Koka’s effect system is its defining feature, and its steepest learning curve.

In Koka, every function signature tells you what effects it uses. You must understand effect rows, effect polymorphism, and how handlers work before you can write non-trivial programs:

fun greet() : console ()
  println("hello")

fun read-config() : <fsys, exn> string
  read-text-file("config.txt".path)

hica curates this power: you get the safety benefits of side-effect tracking (visible via hica check) without writing effect annotations yourself:

fun greet() {
  println("hello")
}

fun read_config() => read_file("config.txt")

The hica compiler infers and emits the correct effects in the generated Koka code. You get Koka’s safety guarantees without the annotation burden. The trade-off is that you cannot define custom effects or write effect handlers. If you need that power, you are ready for Koka.

Type Annotations: Required vs Optional

Koka requires type annotations on public function signatures:

pub fun add(a : int, b : int) : int
  a + b

hica infers types across function boundaries. Annotations are always optional:

pub fun add(a, b) => a + b

You can add them when you want documentation:

pub fun add(a: int, b: int) : int => a + b

This lowers the barrier for beginners. You do not need to understand the type system to write correct programs; the compiler figures it out.

String Handling

Koka uses ++ for concatenation and show for conversion:

fun main()
  val name = "world"
  println("Hello, " ++ name ++ "! " ++ show(42))

hica uses + and has built-in string interpolation:

fun main() {
  let name = "world"
  println("Hello, {name}! {42}")
}

Small difference, big impact on readability when building messages and output.

Data Structures

Lists

Koka’s list operations require understanding of effect signatures and sometimes explicit types:

fun main()
  val nums = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
  val evens = nums.filter(fn(x) x % 2 == 0)
  val doubled = evens.map(fn(x) x * 10)
  println(doubled.show)

hica has the same operations with lighter syntax and a pipe operator:

fun main() {
  let result = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
    |> filter((x) => x % 2 == 0)
    |> map((x) => x * 10)
  println(result)
}

Maps

Koka has no built-in map literal syntax. You would use std/data/dict or build association lists manually.

hica has map literals:

fun main() {
  let ages = {"kalle": 30, "olle": 25}
  println(ages.map_get("kalle"))   // Just(30)
}

Struct update syntax

Koka:

val p2 = p(x = 10)

hica:

let p2 = Point { ...p, x: 10 }

The hica spread syntax is more explicit about what is happening.

Pattern Matching

Both languages have exhaustive pattern matching. Koka’s is more powerful (nested destructuring, guards on handlers, effect matching), whilst hica covers the common cases with a syntax closer to Rust:

fun describe(x) => match x {
  0       => "zero",
  1 | 2   => "few",
  3..=10  => "several",
  _       => "many"
}

fun sum(xs: list<int>) : int => match xs {
  []          => 0,
  [x, ..rest] => x + sum(rest)
}

hica also has bit-level pattern matching with ? wildcards, something Koka does not have:

match opcode {
  0b11??_???? => "category 3",
  0b10??_???? => "category 2",
  _           => "other"
}

Loops and Control Flow

Koka models loops through effect handlers. while and for exist but break and continue require understanding effect-based control flow:

fun main()
  for(1, 10) fn(i)
    println(show(i))

hica has imperative-style loops with break and continue that work as you would expect:

fun main() {
  for i in 1..10 {
    if i % 3 == 0 { continue }
    println(i)
  }

  var count = 0
  while count < 5 {
    println(count)
    count = count + 1
  }

  loop {
    if count > 10 { break }
    count = count + 1
  }
}

Modules and Imports

Koka uses qualified imports:

import std/os/path
import std/os/file

hica uses string-based imports with selective imports and re-exports:

import "std/os/path"
from "std/os/file" import { read_file, write_file }
pub import "mylib/utils"

Error Handling

Koka uses effects for exceptions, which is powerful but requires understanding effect handlers:

fun safe-divide(a : int, b : int) : exn int
  if b == 0 then throw("division by zero")
  a / b

hica uses Result and Maybe types with combinators, the same approach as Rust:

fun safe_divide(a, b) =>
  if b == 0 { Err("division by zero") }
  else { Ok(a / b) }

fun main() {
  let result = safe_divide(10, 2)
    |> map_result((n) => n * 10)
    |> and_then_result((n) => safe_divide(n, 5))
  println(result)
}

Integrated Toolchain

Koka provides a compiler. hica provides a workspace.

The test runner is built on kunit, and the CLI argument parser on klap. Both are purpose-built Koka libraries that ship with hica. You do not install a test framework or argument parser separately; they are part of the toolchain.

Koka has koka -e file.kk to compile-and-run and koka -o to build, but testing, formatting, project scaffolding, and REPL are not built into the compiler workflow.

HML: A Companion Configuration Language

hica has a purpose-built configuration library: HML (Hica Markup Language). HML is a structured data format with first-class support for types like durations, date-times (RFC 3339), and tagged elements, primitives that most config languages encode as strings.

@server(port: 8080, public) {
    host: "localhost"
    timeout: 30s
    started: 2026-05-20T10:00:00Z
}

Add it as a submodule and import:

git submodule add https://github.com/cladam/hml.git lib/hml

import "./lib/hml/src/hml"

Koka has no companion config format; you would reach for JSON or YAML and write your own parsing layer.

When to Use Which

Use hica when:

• You are learning your first compiled language
• You are teaching programming to students
• You want type safety and immutability without a steep learning curve
• You are building applications where you do not need custom effects
• You want a Rust-like syntax with automatic memory management

Use Koka when:

• You want to define and handle custom algebraic effects
• You are doing research in programming language theory
• You need fine-grained control over effect composition
• You have outgrown hica’s feature set and want the full power underneath

The Bridge

Because hica compiles to Koka, the transition is smooth:

1. Import Koka modules from hica. hica can import .kk files directly. Write a library in Koka, use it from hica.
2. Read the generated code. Run hica build <file>.hc to see the Koka output. As you learn, you will start recognising the patterns.
3. Graduate when ready. The concepts transfer: match, immutability, Result/Maybe, function composition are the same in both languages. Koka adds effects and handlers on top.

hica is not a replacement for Koka. It is a front door, a way in that does not require understanding row-typed effects before you can write hello world.

Conclusion

Koka is a brilliant language with ideas that are ahead of their time. Its effect system is genuinely novel and powerful. But that power comes with a learning curve that puts it out of reach for many programmers.

hica keeps the parts that make Koka great (Perceus memory management, algebraic data types, expression-oriented design, compiled performance) and wraps them in a syntax and programming model that is immediately accessible. You lose custom effects and some type-system expressiveness. You gain an integrated toolchain, a companion config language, and a language you can teach in an afternoon.

In short: Koka provides the powerful underlying engine; hica provides a specific, ergonomic cockpit designed for building software tools quickly and safely.